case law for vcsst - An Overview
case law for vcsst - An Overview
Blog Article
Should the employee fails to serve a grievance notice, the NIRC may well dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not had a possibility to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In some cases, the NIRC may well allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to include the grievance notice. However, this is often only carried out if the employee can show that that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. In the present case, the parties were allowed to lead evidence and the petitioner company responded towards the allegations as such they were well aware about the allegations and led the evidence as a result this point is ofno use to become looked into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 204 Order Date: 04-FEB-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Article 199 of the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other sufficient remedy is provided by regulation." It truly is nicely-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust obtainable remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether those remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION:2025 SHC KHI forty six SHC Citation: SHC-252218 Tag:I have heard the realized counsel for the parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments given that the issues on the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard to the interim relief application in terms of Section 7(one) from the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 at hand over possession from the subjected premises for the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to be decided through the competent court after hearing the parties if pending as the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer from the Illegal Dispossession case and as far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court must see this part for interim custody of the subject premises if the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two months from the date of receipt of this order.
The loads of this power casts an obligation about the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested to get a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. However it truly is made crystal clear that police is free to choose action against any person that's indulged in criminal activities issue to regulation. eight. The DIGP concerned is directed to prioritize this matter and, after hearing both parties within two months, address the alleged police misconduct. If your officials are found culpable, departmental proceedings for their punishment must be initiated, plus they shall be assigned non-industry duties in the interim period. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 113 Order Date: 08-APR-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
thirteen . Const. P. 209/2025 (S.B.) Saifullah Jamali (Disable) V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi After arguing the matter at some length, both parties have agreed to your disposal of the moment petition over the premise that the DIGP Malir will hear the petitioner as well as private respondents and will get care of all the aspects of the case and ensure that no harassment shall be caused to both the parties.
Whilst there is not any prohibition against referring to case law from a state other than the state in which the case is being heard, it holds very little sway. Still, if there isn't any precedent within the home state, relevant case regulation from another state could possibly be considered through the court.
27 . Const. P. 4002/2011 (D.B.) Ibrahim Noor V/S Pakistan International Airlines Corporation & Ors. Sindh High Court, Karachi Even, if a petitioner was acquitted in a very criminal case following a conviction, in NAB Reference No. 20/2011, this does not automatically bring about exoneration from departmental charges based to the same factual grounds. Though a writ under Article 199 is obtainable in specific limited situations, it is actually generally not the suitable remedy to contest a dismissal from service based on these charges, particularly when the employee was afforded a full chance to cross-study witnesses and present his/her defense but did not persuade the department of his/her innocence.
We are an independent branch of government constitutionally entrusted with the fair and just resolution of disputes in check here order to preserve the rule of law and to protect the rights and liberties guaranteed from the Constitution and laws in the United States and this State.
In some jurisdictions, case regulation could be applied to ongoing adjudication; for example, criminal proceedings or family legislation.
Binding Precedent – A rule or principle proven by a court, which other courts are obligated to observe.
Federalism also performs a major role in determining the authority of case legislation in a very particular court. Indeed, Each and every circuit has its possess set of binding case regulation. Therefore, a judgment rendered during the Ninth Circuit will not be binding while in the Second Circuit but will have persuasive authority.
The reason for this difference is that these civil legislation jurisdictions adhere to your tradition that the reader should be able to deduce the logic from the decision and also the statutes.[four]
We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy with the information contained on this site, or perhaps the information linked to about the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can make inaccuracies. You should read the full case before counting on it for legal research purposes.
Free database for searching federal court dockets and documents pulled from PACER. Coverage is not really comprehensive, but this is an excellent starting point. See Background section at base of RECAP website for more information.